Skip to main content

Team Teaching: Working Together to Support Student Learning

A productive teaching team can help create an effective learning environment by providing the student with innovative and distinct experiences through the collaborative and creative context. 

Any team-teaching project's level of success will depend on the participants themselves, both from a professional and personal standpoint, as well as the chemistry of their relationship. The value of each member's unique personality and life experiences is noted by Bakken, Clark, and Thompson: "We felt that we were mature enough to compromise, secure enough to share power, wise enough not to take things too seriously and to find humor in most situations, confident enough to try new strategies, and professional enough to seek feedback to make improvements" (Bakken, Clark and Thompson, 1998). 

Being committed to team teaching necessitates being prepared to collaborate closely with another professional and having the self-awareness to be open and truthful about one's own traits and qualities. It is crucial to have the essential generic skills of interpersonal and communication, flexibility and adaptation, as well as problem-solving, decision-making, and evaluation abilities (Cook and Friend, 1995). Honesty and humor are the essential ingredients, as advised by Melba Smithwick: “Lay all the cards on the table, don’t speak with hidden messages, be direct, honest, kind, professional, friendly, and – for goodness sakes – keep a positive attitude and a good sense of humor” (Cromwell, 2005).

It is thought that a collaborative working environment, supported by shared teaching philosophies and a strong professional and personal relationship, can be regarded as an important representation of the five guidelines for effective teaching collaboration presented by Bennett, Ishler, and O'Loughlin (1992): the presence of a genuinely equal relationship; the equal importance of different knowledge bases; the mutual commitment to engaging in ongoing dialogue and inquiry; We believe the ultimate winners are the students who want to carry on the discussion we started during class. Our own discourse has been extensive and interesting, offering a high level of professional satisfaction and advancement.


References:

Bennett, R. V., Ishler, M. F. & O’Loughlin, M. (1992). Effective collabo-ration in teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 14 (1), 52-6.

Bakken, L, Clark, F. L, & Thompson, J. (1998). Collaborative teaching: many joys, some surprises, and a few worms. College Teaching, 46 (4), 154-157.

Cook, L. & Friend, M. (1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(3), 1-15.

Cromwell, S. (2005). Team teaching: teaming teachers offer tips. Educa-tion World. Retrieved March 2, 2006, from http://www.educationworld.com/a_admin/admin/admin290.shtml

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Constructivist Learning Environments to Enhance e-Learning

Even if there is a lot of potential for e-Learning, there are many instances where it is just a copy of conventional (didactic) learning environments. The emphasis on constructivism as a learning philosophy, epistemology, and pedagogical approach has also grown recently. Constructivist Learning Environments (CLE) have the ability to offer real and interesting settings for e-Learning. Using the cognitive apprenticeship concept and project-based learning, we have offered some guidelines in this work for the creation of one such CLE.                                        The approach suggests learning about information systems through actual usage of information systems, with less emphasis on overt lecturing and conventional teaching methods. Information Systems is not learnt by only studying practice, but by really engaging in it for the duration of the module/course. For the sake of con...

The Role of Interaction in e-Learning

One of the most significant components of learning experiences, both in traditional education and distance education, has been identified as Interaction. According to Berge (1999), interaction in a virtual environment can be broadly defined as,  "two-way communication among two or more people within a learning context, with the purposes of either task/instruction completion or social relationship building, that includes a means for teacher and learner to receive feedback and for adaptation to occur based upon information and activities with which the participants are engaged". Wagner (1994) defines interaction as: "reciprocal events that require at least two objects and two actions. Interactions occur when these objects and events mutually influence one another. An instructional interac-tion is an event that takes place between a learner and the learner's environment. Its purpose is to respond to the learner in a way intended to change his or her behavior toward and ...