Skip to main content

Team Teaching: Working Together to Support Student Learning

A productive teaching team can help create an effective learning environment by providing the student with innovative and distinct experiences through the collaborative and creative context. 

Any team-teaching project's level of success will depend on the participants themselves, both from a professional and personal standpoint, as well as the chemistry of their relationship. The value of each member's unique personality and life experiences is noted by Bakken, Clark, and Thompson: "We felt that we were mature enough to compromise, secure enough to share power, wise enough not to take things too seriously and to find humor in most situations, confident enough to try new strategies, and professional enough to seek feedback to make improvements" (Bakken, Clark and Thompson, 1998). 

Being committed to team teaching necessitates being prepared to collaborate closely with another professional and having the self-awareness to be open and truthful about one's own traits and qualities. It is crucial to have the essential generic skills of interpersonal and communication, flexibility and adaptation, as well as problem-solving, decision-making, and evaluation abilities (Cook and Friend, 1995). Honesty and humor are the essential ingredients, as advised by Melba Smithwick: “Lay all the cards on the table, don’t speak with hidden messages, be direct, honest, kind, professional, friendly, and – for goodness sakes – keep a positive attitude and a good sense of humor” (Cromwell, 2005).

It is thought that a collaborative working environment, supported by shared teaching philosophies and a strong professional and personal relationship, can be regarded as an important representation of the five guidelines for effective teaching collaboration presented by Bennett, Ishler, and O'Loughlin (1992): the presence of a genuinely equal relationship; the equal importance of different knowledge bases; the mutual commitment to engaging in ongoing dialogue and inquiry; We believe the ultimate winners are the students who want to carry on the discussion we started during class. Our own discourse has been extensive and interesting, offering a high level of professional satisfaction and advancement.


References:

Bennett, R. V., Ishler, M. F. & O’Loughlin, M. (1992). Effective collabo-ration in teacher education. Action in Teacher Education, 14 (1), 52-6.

Bakken, L, Clark, F. L, & Thompson, J. (1998). Collaborative teaching: many joys, some surprises, and a few worms. College Teaching, 46 (4), 154-157.

Cook, L. & Friend, M. (1995). Co-teaching: Guidelines for creating effective practices. Focus on Exceptional Children, 28(3), 1-15.

Cromwell, S. (2005). Team teaching: teaming teachers offer tips. Educa-tion World. Retrieved March 2, 2006, from http://www.educationworld.com/a_admin/admin/admin290.shtml

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Building and Sustaining Learning Communities

Students benefit from education in ways that go beyond the classroom. Interaction-based learning communities have been increasingly popular over the past ten years as a part of the educational process. Building new educational strategies and delivery methods are required for the growth of learning communities (Palloff & Pratt, 1999). The following three crucial factors influence the growth of learning communities: 1) individual competencies – time management skills, communication skills, and networking skills for developing social capital; 2) quality course design – establishment of social presence, integration of technology, authentic and project-based learning; and 3) learning environments – conducive to learning, to fostering a social climate, and to sustaining a learning community. It is argued that community learning will impact the quality of education, and contribute to the developing social capital that will benefit humankind. Students must have the opportunity to partici...

25 Years of Ed Tech by Martin Weller

       Every human endeavor is impacted by one of the domains that is evolving most  quickly in the current era: technology. One area that has benefited from these technological advancements is education. While some educational institutions have adopted these technological advancements without a hitch, others have found it difficult to keep up with the evolving needs and expectations of students. The speed of technical advancements and the shifting conditions the educational system has seen over the past few decades might be better understood from a historical viewpoint. How to meet the needs of educational seekers from three different generations is these schools' greater task (Gen X, millennials, and postmillennials). The book “25 Years of Ed Tech” has successfully completed the work of chronicling these important historical turning points in technological advancement and use in education beginning in 1994. Instead of starting with its inception, the author ha...

Video, Voice and Virtual Collaboration: The 3V's of Asynchronous Education

  Asynchronous versus Synchronous is without a doubt one of the most contentious issues in online education. Discussions almost often center on the idea that synchronous courses are dynamic and so offer more learning fidelity than asynchronous courses, which are characterized as static but less time-intensive. The proponents of either kind of online education tend to indicate there is no gray area — you are either a supporter of one or the other, for reasons that are not quite clear. There are numerous excellent definitions of both synchronous and asynchronous delivery methods. Synchronous Online Education refers to Internet-based instruction in which the teacher and students engage in learning activities simultaneously. Asynchronous Online Education refers to online learning in which the teacher and students engage in learning activities at various times. Here in this blog we will discuss the possibility of delivering asynchronous course with the advantages associated wi...